Number of loops cannot = 1?

General topics regarding SCS
Post Reply
escrge
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Contact:

Number of loops cannot = 1?

Post by escrge » Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:27 am

Using 10.6.1:

SCS won’t let me use a single loop. It says I have to use a number >1. So I can have unlimited or 2, but not one? Two loops is too long for my current need.
David H.M. Lambert
Lambert Studios
http://www.LambertStudios.net

jmgordon
Posts: 241
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 12:54 am
Location: Herts., UK

Re: Number of loops cannot = 1?

Post by jmgordon » Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:03 am

Have you tried it? The pop-up label on the loop count box says "Number of times the looped part of the sound is to be heard...". Surely, if it's only heard once it's not a loop. If you enter "2", it will loop back once only and then play to the end.

Malcolm

escrge
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Contact:

Re: Number of loops cannot = 1?

Post by escrge » Sat Sep 19, 2009 12:40 am

Hmm... I suppose the value of >1 seemed a bit misleading. I expected to enter a value of 1 to loop once. Instead I need a value of 2 to play a certain section twice. I suppose it's just a matter of semantics. Never mind.
David H.M. Lambert
Lambert Studios
http://www.LambertStudios.net

jkowtko
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:36 am
Location: Redwood Shores, CA (SF Bay Area)
Contact:

Re: Number of loops cannot = 1?

Post by jkowtko » Sat Sep 19, 2009 3:15 am

Mike, if there's a lot of confusion on this, you might consider using a term which is clear on whether or not the first iteration is included in the count ... for example:
- "# iterations" includes the first time through the audio section
- "# repeats" does not include the first time through.
Maybe those aren't very clear either ... :|
John Kowtko
Sound Designer/Engineer
Local schools and community theater
Redwood City, CA USA

Mike Daniell
Site Admin
Posts: 3630
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:58 am
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. TZ:GMT+10
Contact:

Re: Number of loops cannot = 1?

Post by Mike Daniell » Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:33 am

jkowtko wrote:Mike, if there's a lot of confusion on this, you might consider using a term which is clear on whether or not the first iteration is included in the count ...
Yes, this is probably the best solution. I remember not being sure whether to make the 'number of loops' inclusive or exclusive of the first iteration, and for some reason settled on making it inclusive.
Mike Daniell
Show Cue Systems Pty Ltd
mike@showcuesystems.com
Image

Post Reply