My Compliments to the Chef...
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:38 am
Dear Mike,
Thank you so much for your work on this SCS. For years, I've been a user of another cue playback program.
At the price, I would not have been able to update even one of the several licenses I must hold for the other program, so it seemed like a very good choice to give SCS a try.
So, first, let me express gratitude for a realistic licensing program that takes a composer/designer's pay scale into account. It is actually more than generous, and I applaud you. It's not only a great service to designers, but to theaters in general, many of whom could never justify computer playback.
But beyond that, I am very impressed with the feature set, and the pragmatic choices available when programming a show. It shows a good understanding of the design process, particularly the pressures of problem-solving in tech rehearsal. I find that complex cues which would have scrolled a couple of screens in the software I previously used can now be designed within a single nested series of sub-cues, greatly simplifying the troubleshooting process when "in the clinch."
I am excited to be working with SCS, and after this first "trial run," I suspect that I will not be looking back. The show is running well.
Best regards,
Bruce
Thank you so much for your work on this SCS. For years, I've been a user of another cue playback program.
At the price, I would not have been able to update even one of the several licenses I must hold for the other program, so it seemed like a very good choice to give SCS a try.
So, first, let me express gratitude for a realistic licensing program that takes a composer/designer's pay scale into account. It is actually more than generous, and I applaud you. It's not only a great service to designers, but to theaters in general, many of whom could never justify computer playback.
But beyond that, I am very impressed with the feature set, and the pragmatic choices available when programming a show. It shows a good understanding of the design process, particularly the pressures of problem-solving in tech rehearsal. I find that complex cues which would have scrolled a couple of screens in the software I previously used can now be designed within a single nested series of sub-cues, greatly simplifying the troubleshooting process when "in the clinch."
I am excited to be working with SCS, and after this first "trial run," I suspect that I will not be looking back. The show is running well.
Best regards,
Bruce